Banks in Canada
Over on the Washington Post today Steven Pearlstein has done a Q & A with the public (for his column referred to in much of the discussion, click here). Someone asked him how the Canadian banking system seemed to be in so much better health than the American. His reply:
The Canadians have a more logical regulatory structure, as I understand it. They also have more respect for civil servants and government in general, and bank regulators in particular -- the Canadian public, for some reason I never understood, gets very agitated when banks make too much profit. Kind of a populist thing from the prairie. But what's also at work is that their banks are simply more conservatively run and haven't got caught up in the kind of silly and dangerous competition that the big American banks have.
The Canadian Way. I always thought it was much like the Minnesota Way until Minnesotans decided their distinctive heritage could be safely relegated to "The Prairie Home Companion" and joined the national culture.
alas poor Anoka.
Labels: bankers, banks, Canada, financial crisis
5 Comments:
I wonder what Garrison Keilor thinks about the Kennsington Runestone?
He's against it. Unless he can milk it for monologue material.
And luckily our Conservatives didn't get a chance to deregulate as much as they would have liked. (Or join in the Iraq War for that matter...)
Did he say anything about European banks, ie is their regulatory structure logical? They're in worse shape than we, and I hear that they are much more regulated.
Don't know Jack. They do seem to be in more trouble, but I'm not sure. And I certainly don't know why.
Post a Comment
<< Home