27 May 2009

Banks in Canada

Over on the Washington Post today Steven Pearlstein has done a Q & A with the public (for his column referred to in much of the discussion, click here). Someone asked him how the Canadian banking system seemed to be in so much better health than the American. His reply:
The Canadians have a more logical regulatory structure, as I understand it. They also have more respect for civil servants and government in general, and bank regulators in particular -- the Canadian public, for some reason I never understood, gets very agitated when banks make too much profit. Kind of a populist thing from the prairie. But what's also at work is that their banks are simply more conservatively run and haven't got caught up in the kind of silly and dangerous competition that the big American banks have.

The Canadian Way. I always thought it was much like the Minnesota Way until Minnesotans decided their distinctive heritage could be safely relegated to "The Prairie Home Companion" and joined the national culture.

alas poor Anoka.

Labels: , , ,

5 Comments:

At 27 May, 2009 21:08, Anonymous Maire said...

I wonder what Garrison Keilor thinks about the Kennsington Runestone?

 
At 28 May, 2009 11:58, Blogger Clemens said...

He's against it. Unless he can milk it for monologue material.

 
At 28 May, 2009 18:54, Blogger Elliot said...

And luckily our Conservatives didn't get a chance to deregulate as much as they would have liked. (Or join in the Iraq War for that matter...)

 
At 29 May, 2009 19:21, Blogger jack perry said...

Did he say anything about European banks, ie is their regulatory structure logical? They're in worse shape than we, and I hear that they are much more regulated.

 
At 29 May, 2009 21:14, Blogger Clemens said...

Don't know Jack. They do seem to be in more trouble, but I'm not sure. And I certainly don't know why.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home