26 May 2008

Do NOT shop at Exxon/Mobil

Have you, perhaps, noticed that the prices at the pump keep going up? Want to know who to blame? Well, so would most of us, but the big oil companies keep telling us they have nothing to do with it. Even though they are making record breaking profits, that is simply an unintended consequence of market forces that the oil companies simply can't control.

If you want to know just how much bullwhaah this is, read this article in The Washington Post. It explains how Exxon Mobil, the biggest of big oil, uses computer price tracking to make sure that while the company is rolling in money, its station owners do NOT benefit at all. Exxon allows them to make about 8 cents a gallon no matter what. If the owners raise the price by even a penny, then Exxon raises the wholesale price by exactly that penny, often by the next day.

Read this:
Major integrated U.S. oil companies -- which produce crude oil, own refineries and sell gasoline -- have been reaping billions of dollars in profit from high oil prices over the past two years, but they are still working to extract every penny they can from the marketing end of the business. Exxon Mobil doesn't break out its earnings from marketing alone, but its 2007 profits in worldwide refining and marketing -- known as the downstream part of the oil business -- reached $9.6 billion, 43 percent of that coming from the United States.

And if weren't enough, Exxon has started raising the rent on the land the stations are on by roughly a third over the next three years.

But let's get back to Exxon's fine tuning of the prices. One station owner interviewed by the Post for the article owns five different stations in Northern Virginia, yet Exxon charges him different amounts depending on unstated variables in the market. But ..

... he still cannot fathom how the oil company can charge him different wholesale gasoline prices for each of the five Northern Virginia stations he owns. The stations all sell the same Exxon-branded gasoline, delivered from the same terminal in Newington, where it arrives via the same pipeline. Sometimes, Daggle said, it's even dropped off by the same truck and driver hours apart on the same day.

The only thing that's different is the price, which can vary by 35 cents per gallon, Daggle said. "If I could have driven a truck to Gainesville and drive the gas from there to Shirlington, I could have made 50 cents a gallon."

So, part of that nearly $4 a gallon you are paying is fudgable; by as much as 35 cents at the whim of the oil company. So what explains that 35 cents?

G.R.E.E.D.

Every time you and I fill up our tank, we are sending money to a bunch of people who bear us no good will whatsoever and only see us as a bunch of dupes who will pay endlessly for a product whose supply they control. This is as true of the folks who run Exxon Mobil as it is of Hugo Chavez or the Saudi royal family or the mad mullahs of Iran.

And two of our three presidential candidates think it is a good idea to lower our gas tax so you can continue doing this. These clowns have to go. All of them.

Labels: , ,

4 Comments:

At 27 May, 2008 00:10, Blogger jack perry said...

I'll put my money on supply and demand. I don't think Exxon was any less greedy 3 years ago than it was today.

If Exxon does this, and if it's as bad as the station owners say, then Exxon deserves what's coming to it. Stations will fail (as the article notes). Eventually, Exxon will start losing money, while saner companies will not. This will force Exxon to re-evaluate their practices.

Meanwhile, I do agree wholeheartedly that the government should stop giving them tax breaks and subsidies.

 
At 28 May, 2008 23:43, Blogger Clemens said...

Yes, supply and demand. Which is why I am strongly suggesting that we all quit demanding anything from Exxon Mobil. And I am also suggesting that they are gaming the supply and demand situation. They certainly are not any greedier than they were 3 years ago. Nor are they any greedier than when they tried to bill the state of Alaska for the Exxon Valdez clean-up (after preening in their ads about what a good public spirited co. they were for cleaning up the mess that was, just somehow, made).

And yes indeedy. I do believe that Exxon deserves what's coming to it.

And now is the time to be upping the federal gas taxes - to lower demand which will cause prices to drop. Which they are likely to do now anyway, for several reasons, falling demand being one of them.

Unlike a great many academics, I used to work for a big corporation. Since I was their historian, I got to see their operation from the inside out since the dawn of the company. It left me a bit, how should I say, cynical?

But that's just me.

 
At 29 May, 2008 09:55, Blogger jack perry said...

Good! then we are agreed. Except for the part where they are gaming the supply and demand system, considering that gasoline retail is a pretty good example of what economists call perfect competition: no one can game it, because consumers can always choose to go to another station. ...unless, that is, they're in a rush, or don't want to be inconvenienced by driving a few miles down the road.

Even academics are better off than that, because some universities have great reputations and are in higher demand. Other universities are content to live off that public dole called Federal Aid programs.

Anyway, I don't recall the last time I shopped Exxon/Mobil, so I don't have a problem boycotting it. I've just never understood why people are in such a rage about them while other oil companies do the same, or worse. Why not boycott BP as well, and Chevron, Crown, Kangaroo, Raceway, Texaco, etc.?

*Disclaimer: To my knowledge, I own no stock in Exxon/Mobil, although TIAA-CREF might. Nor do I have plans to own any stock in Exxon/Mobil, but boy do I wish I had bought some a couple of years ago. So I have no idea why I'm making a fool of myself via the appearance of defending idiotic and repugnant business practices.

 
At 29 May, 2008 20:15, Blogger Clemens said...

Exxon Mobile seems to be a vertical monopoly, if I remember High School Econ right. And the reason for picking on it (other than their behavior with the Exxon Valdez fiasco) is because they are the biggest, by far. Put pressure on them and you can have an effect while still having other outlets to by the precious liquid.

Or ride the bus more often.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home