25 January 2007

An Evil Memory from the Past

In my early teens I was greatly troubled by news stories about the murders of civil rights workers and African Americans in the south, usually in Mississippi and Alabama. I was both outraged and embarrassed by the fact that the murderers were known and protected, even honored, within their communities. In one case the Feds brought the murderers to trial in a local courtroom, proved their case, the defending attorney ranted about how worthless blacks were as a race, and the jury found the men, all local law enforcement officers, not guilty. Several of the jury members helpfully explained that the murdered boys deserved it and they wouldn't find anyone guilty of killing them.

All of this came back to mind today when I read a story on AOL about one of these cases that has been resurrected. Here are some snippets from the story about the arrest of a former deputy for the murder of two young men:

The former deputy, James Ford Seale, of Roxie, Miss., was named in a federal indictment charging him in connection with the teens' disappearance and deaths while they were hitchhiking in a rural area of the state east of Natchez. Until recently, Seale was thought to be dead, and the investigation into the two deaths had long been abandoned.

[At the time] Federal authorities, who were focusing on the more famous "Mississippi Burning" killings, turned the case over to local authorities. A short time later, a justice of the peace called an end to the inquiry without presenting evidence to a grand jury.

The case is the latest long-dormant civil rights-era killing to be reopened decades after the crimes were committed. The others include:

-A 1994 conviction in Mississippi of Byron de la Beckwith for the 1963 sniper killing of NAACP leader Medgar Evers.

-Bobby Frank Cherry, convicted in 2002 in Alabama of killing four black girls in the bombing of a Birmingham church in 1963. In 2001, Thomas Blanton was convicted in the church bombing.

-Edgar Ray Killen, an 80-year-old former Klansman, convicted of manslaughter in June 2005 in the deaths of James Chaney, Andrew Goodman and Michael Schwerner, the three civil rights workers who were killed near Philadelphia in 1964.


That's a long list of old cases. What's going on here?

Basically the Feds knew they couldn't get convictions and that no one in these communities would cooperate. So over time they lost interest and lost track - btw, do you really think that anyone who had ever known Mr Seale ever thought he was "dead"? In other words these murderers were known and protected.

This was what I knew at the time and that made me mad, disgusted, and ultimately cynical, especially about that good ol' down home religion I knew so well. Every one of these murders took place in communities that are as religious as any in the country. The murderers all went to church and were well known in their Christian communities. And every one of these Christian communities covered up for them, and in some cases made it clear that they regarded the perpetrators as honorable men simply defending their godfearing communities from godless outsiders - the words Jews and Yankees came up frequently in their conversations (this was all long ago, and my memory is no better than anyone else's, but I do not believe I am mischaracterizing what I heard at the time).

These people were and are the immediate ancestors of the Bible Belt communities that gave rise to much of the religiosity current in America today. I am not saying that anyone still feels that way or is in any way responsible for what happened so many years ago. In fact there is a sprig of hope in the fact that attitudes have changed enough for these cases finally to be brought to trial.

But I am a child of my past, as is everyone. This is what I picture even now when I am confronted with a certain type of religiosity. It is, perhaps, a mindless prejudice I should abandon. Perhaps. I just have this nagging feeling that not enough has changed, or can change. Human nature is eterenal. Substitute Muslims, or gays, or HIV positive people, for the black, civil rights workers and Jews of my youth and you can see what worries me.

I could be wrong, I keep telling myself.

5 Comments:

At 26 January, 2007 12:35, Anonymous Anonymous said...

It is indeed troubling. I have a great deal of trouble with people who claim that all the world *really* needs is Christ - don't worry about social justice or education or medicine - give people Christ and the rest will take care of itself.

On the one hand, that does happen sometimes. People get Christ and then go about doing astonishing good works.

But so often you see people or communities who have Christ and orthodox teaching, and just use it to bolster and justify whatever they want to do, turning the whole thing into a code of superiority and inferiority, purity and impurity, etc.

The depressing part is: where is the Holy Spirit in this? The presence of Christ? These people SEEM to display genuine conversions, the whole shebang, and talk about Christ non-stop, but are still willing to go on committing whatever evils they're engaged in.

If it weren't for those remarkable instances where the story of Christ *does* radically change people for the good of the whole world, it'd be tempting to just drop the whole religion and become a socialist activist or something.

I came across a piece of theology the other day which said that Christ is not in the church so that it can feel superior and good about itself. He's there because he's challenging us, tormenting us, calling us onwards, the relentless demand that we follow him, the constant reminder breaking up our self-justifications. That made a lot of sense to me at the time. Perhaps that's what goes wrong - people think Christ is there to justify them, to be on their side (after all, aren't they the victims and/or God's chosen people?) when really they should be afflicted by him asking "Why are you persecuting me?"

Sorry for the long comment, I'm just trying to work some of this out to my own satisfaction. Let me know if it makes any sense at all.

 
At 26 January, 2007 12:36, Anonymous Anonymous said...

PS: Not that I think socialist activism would really solve anything in the long term either.

 
At 26 January, 2007 21:32, Blogger Clemens said...

Yes, its a hard one to work out. And there is another side to it. There would have been no civil rights movement, indeed no abolition movement, if not for Christians doing exactly what they thought their faith directed them to do.

When you go to Europe and see the stupendous labor and expense that went into the cathedrals it is easy for a Protestant boy to be appalled - until you stop and think what we put OUR money into - more money on eye make-up than eye-disease research, for example, or into our weapons systeems.

I just wish we could be a bit more humble about it. Jesus wanted us to go into our little closets and pray rather than out on the streets where everyone could see us. Whenever we think we know for sure what God is telling us, we should become most suspicious. We might be wrong (to say the very least).

But thanks for the response to help me to remember this other side.

 
At 27 January, 2007 20:53, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Gosh, I was just wrestling with my own doubts. But I'm glad if it helped somehow.

I guess the trouble was that the abolitionists and civil rights people were ALSO really sure they knew what God wanted them to do. I bet they got accused of arrogance too.

Speaking of abolitionists, have you read Gilead? Now there's an interesting meditation on this whole question.

 
At 27 January, 2007 23:17, Blogger Clemens said...

They got accused of a lot more than arrogance!

But I have to believe they were right.

No - I haven't read Giliad, though I saw it cited in The Week just today as someone's favorite book. I may give it a read (once I find the time! Or it comes out on CD).

 

Post a Comment

<< Home