26 January 2007

The New Libraries

My wife now works in the Lykes Co Library. She likes it partly, I think, because it is so educational. This snippet of an article by Thomas Washington from The Washington Post therefore struck a chord:

I became a school librarian because I loved books and wanted to bring
the joy of reading to young people... Silly me. Young people no longer read for pleasure, and libraries are no longer places to discover great works of literature and biography and history. We librarians now exist soley to help bored students maximize their database searches, so they can complete papers and assignments in minimal time. When students do check out a book on, say, Jane Austen or Thomas Jefferson, they don't actually read it; they check it back in the next day, having copied down what they need to cite the book as a "source."

Camen has a young colleague at the library who is taking a course at the
Lykes Community College and had a paper to write for one of her classes.
She was going through a web site rapidly cutting and pasting paragraphs.
When Carmen ask her is she was able to read the blocks she was cutting at that
speed the young woman said no, but that was all that was needed to complete the
paper.

7 Comments:

At 27 January, 2007 20:55, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hmph. I just found out someone I know did that on a lot of their high school papers.

I guess I'm a geek to believe in the value of learning, but that kind of cheating just seems so wrong. A sin that hurts the one who commits it more than anyone

 
At 27 January, 2007 20:55, Anonymous Anonymous said...

...else.
More than anyone else.

 
At 27 January, 2007 21:24, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Of course, it doesn't speak very well of the Community College instructors if they can't catch plagiarism that blatant! Still, it speaks even worse of the students.

 
At 27 January, 2007 23:07, Blogger Clemens said...

Our impression is that she was marking them as quotes, and that is all the teacher expected. For instance one of the questions was: What are the sacraments of the Catholic Church? So she found a web page that said 'Here are the Sacraments of the Catholic Church' - and simiply blocked it and pasted it - without actually reading it. It is the intellectual sloppiness of it rather than actual plagiarism that is the problem.

I think.

 
At 28 January, 2007 21:32, Blogger Joey said...

I had a teacher that encouraged us to do that exactly what that girl was doing. She said that research is not about "what you think about something".

She obviously does not understand the difference between research and a review.

--Joey

 
At 29 January, 2007 12:51, Blogger Clemens said...

Joey - was that in HS or USF? Glad to see the quality of education has remained consistant down there in the big Port City.

What a weird concept of research. You can not DO it without thinking something about it - otherwise you are simply compiling lists.

An essay about a book that simply tells you what the book is about is no more useful than the publisher's catalog entry. An essay that tells you what the author THINKS about the book and WHY is a good critical review, and might be very helpful.

 
At 30 January, 2007 22:44, Blogger Joey said...

Fortunately, High School. This teacher was a dope. She wanted us to quote "everything that wasn't common knowledge" So she proceeds to give us the following example "You don't need to quote that World War II started in 1944".

So anytime I knew something that I considered to be obvious but this mental midget didn't know or couldn't figure out I quoted myself...via a website...that I wrote.

She also said that her definition of intelligence was how well read someone was...

--Joey

*History can be tricky, I mean that little scuffle in Europe and the Pacific was over 60 years. I had a health teacher that told us that the reason why there was so many monster movies during the 50s was because of people wanting to escape the news of World War II.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home