13 March 2007

"300" - and the Hard Right

Perhaps I should have phrased that a little differently, considering how some of Andrew Sullivan's readers have interpreted '300'. [and btw, thanks Elliot, and Anactoria!] But have you begun to wonder what real men, the burly men of the Right Wing would make of this flick? I mean the John Wayne/Gary Cooper type?

Well, just check out this sharply observant review by a Hollywood writer writing under the name David Kahane on National Review Online. It even mentions Wayne and Cooper, pining for a simpler time when you knew who your enemies were. First notice that the first three paragraphs make no sense at all unless you assume, like, say, Dan Simmons, that our enemies consist of the entire Muslim population of the planet, plain and simple. Here is an example of
the prose of this review:

The Spartans mock the god-king Xerxes (whose traveling throne resembles a particularly louche Brazilian gay-pride carnival float), mow down his armored “immortal” holy warriors clad is nothing but red cloaks, loincloths, and sandals, and generally give their last full measure to defend Greek civilization against superstition and tyranny. Where are the liberal Spartan voices raised in protest against this blatant homophobia, xenophobia, and racism?

You might note from that last line that Mr Kahane has no idea about the homoerotic appeal of the Spartans, nor that gay men aren't all queens. But, let that pass. Just read the review and see what you think.

All I'll say about it is that Kahane is certainly no poseur.

Labels: , , ,

6 Comments:

At 14 March, 2007 06:18, Blogger Elliot said...

How does he tell his 'bad guys' from his 'good guys?'

 
At 14 March, 2007 13:49, Blogger Clemens said...

Better yet - how can we?

 
At 15 March, 2007 14:41, Blogger Elliot said...

Blessed are the meek!
Well, was it Solzhenitsyn who said that the line between good and evil ran straight down the middle of the human heart?

 
At 15 March, 2007 15:48, Blogger Clemens said...

I agree with Solzhenitsyn. As did Chesterton I believe.

And, in thinking about it, I think the reviewer can tell the good guys from the bad by skin color judging from '300'.

And since you are checking in, didn't you think that Kahane's prose sounded a bit like Nicolosi (she of the 'Pan's Labyrinth' review I disliked so much)? They are both conservative and both Hollywood writers.

I'm just asking.

 
At 17 March, 2007 02:44, Anonymous Anonymous said...

So apparently 300 is playing well with gays? That may not be that surprising if you think about it. Every gender/orientation is covered.

Gay men/Straight women will like the ripped men fighting

Straight men/Lesbians will like the carnage, and the women making out in Xerxes' tent.

And everyone will enjoy Persians getting slaughtered.

--Joey

 
At 19 March, 2007 12:04, Blogger Clemens said...

Hey, hey hey!

I LIKE the Persian Empire. It was the best deal going for the forces of civilization at the time.

And besides, us Indo-Europeans have to stick together. Which probably explains why so many of the chief Persians were shown as Negroes. In reality most were as 'white' as the Greeks.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home