01 October 2006

The Century War IV: The Great Shaitan - Iran

Iran is actually the great military, economic and cultural power in that part of the Muslim world. As Indo-European Shia Muslims, they are not likely to side with Semitic Sunni, no matter what Simmons' fantasies are. Yes, it is a dangerous country, but it is one country. I suspect that the recent war in Lebanon is its high water mark of popularity in the Arabic world. Read some of Fouad Ajami, a Shiite Lebanese American, when he talks about his reception among Sunni Arabs or Victor Hanson's comments on how unpopular Iranians are within the Arabic world. For the moment, you can see how likely a Shia/Sunni anti-west pact is by tracking the sectarian slaughter in Iraq.

Yet Iran is genuinely a threat, all by itself, especially if it gets nuclear weapons. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is a frightening man, not because he has a delusional and irrational belief in the coming of the hidden Twelfth Imam, but because he is quite sane, quite rational, and clearly knows how to push all our buttons. But he does not rule Iran. The mullahs who do have become rich and comfortable. It hard to see them daring the US to a game of nuclear brinksmanship. This does not even bring up what Israel is likely to do on its own, with or without US approval. And if you think Iran has the capability to be more than a regional threat, let me know who they will accomplish this. The greatest threat Iran has to us right now is it oil threat. Seeing all this as a vast pan-Islamic death pact to take over western civilization may not be the best way of dealing with this problem.

2 Comments:

At 02 October, 2006 02:38, Blogger kipwatson said...

I had dealings with an Iranian chap some years ago. From a unfavoured minority (the details elude me), persecuted by the regime, lost some relatives, came here as a refugee.

Sad stuff. However he was surprisingly philosophical about it.

But get him started on talking about Arabs! About their flaws and failings he could be quite passionate.

There's a lesson there somewhere.

(Actually, the big lesson for me back then was that was actually a difference between Iranians, Persians and Arabs. Ah, those days of innocent indifference.)

 
At 05 October, 2006 17:52, Blogger Clemens said...

A Bahai perhaps? They did not benefit from the great Iranian Revolution, since Muslims view them as 'heretics' rather than another 'People of the Book.'

Your post is more evidence that we are making a mistake when we think in terms of 'Islam' as one vast monolithic force.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home